China, the US and Trade Wars
All else being equal, we believe the overall near-term trade-war winner is likely to be the US, but recent comments from Chinese President Xi Jinping in which he warned outside influences not to dictate to China what it should do are significant because he has set them in the context of the long term. China has fluctuated between being the world’s biggest world power a few hundred years ago, to an economic minnow as late as the 1970s, to a global superpower today; so it seems fair to say that the country has a long-term view on achieving economic pre-eminence on the global stage. In the near term, China may have lost the battle with the US over trade sanctions, but it might still win the war on trade over a longer time horizon. We would expect market noise around US-Sino relations to remain prominent in 2019.
The fact that the US economy is starting to lose momentum will not slow the US president down. If anything, US President Donald Trump is likely to become even more strident. It is possible that his ‘Art of the Deal’ approach – i.e. to push for more than he can reasonably achieve – will define the narrative around US-Sino trade negotiations, so for now the noise will rumble on, with any Chinese goods either entering or leaving the US likely to suffer in the near term. The US has the wherewithal to produce all of the items it has been importing from China, but the pertinent question remains how much such a move will end up costing the US consumer. There will be a question mark over US companies’ profitability if growth is sluggish while costs are rising. If US prices incurred by the increased cost of producing goods domestically are passed onto the US consumer without companies justifying the rise, we could see the onset of a ‘stagflation’ scenario in the US. If the perception grows that the US president is losing his positive impact on the economy, it is quite feasible that we will see greater urgency from his political opponents in relation to the political and legal issues that currently surround him.
For Europe, there is the very real prospect that the rate cycle may start to reverse in the US before it even begins in earnest in the Eurozone. The French government’s reaction to the ‘gilets jaunes’ protests appears to be a signal that the European Union (EU) is going to have to contend with upward pressure on its fiscal deficit – which will not be easy considering its current commitment to a process of fiscal tightening. This story may run on for some time against a backdrop where European economic data has continued to be uninspiring. It is increasingly easy to see Europe undergoing ‘Japanization’: the poor demographics and low-interest-rate trap that enveloped Japan over two decades.
The Brexit saga continues to rumble on, much to the growing chagrin of the UK population, and serves as proof, if any were needed, that the EU continues to hold up the UK as an example to act as a deterrent to others that may be tempted to exit the bloc. UK Prime Minister Theresa May’s precarious position and ensuing domestic political instability make the task of delivering Brexit even more fraught, and we are likely to see various twists and turns ahead. So far, it has paid to be hedged out of sterling and focused on overseas earners in the UK market. At some point over the coming months, UK domestic stocks may present attractive valuation entry points if the uncertainty takes a further toll on current price levels.
After outperforming for much of 2018, Japan sold off significantly in the fourth quarter as global risk aversion hit the market hard. The country is far from immune from global economic forces; but with valuations now at multi-year lows, corporate governance continuing to steadily improve and the Bank of Japan showing no sign of changing direction with its very loose monetary policies, we continue to find attractive opportunities in Japanese companies.
This is a section from our recent paper on the outlook for markets in 2019. You can read the full paper here.
This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell this security, country or sector. Please note that strategy holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice. Compared to more established economies, the value of investments in emerging markets may be subject to greater volatility, owing to differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic, political instability or less developed market practices.
This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only.
‘Newton’ and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to the following group of affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited and Newton Investment Management (North America) Limited (NIMNA Ltd). In the UK, NIMNA Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business and is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Registered in England no. 2675952. NIMNA Ltd is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. NIMNA Ltd’s investment business is described in Form ADV, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the SEC.gov website or obtained upon request.
Personnel of certain of our BNY Mellon affiliates may act as: (i) registered representatives of MBSC Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered broker-dealer) to offer securities, (ii) officers of the Bank of New York Mellon (a New York chartered bank) to offer bank-maintained collective investment funds, and (iii) Associated Persons of MBSC Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered investment adviser) to offer separately managed accounts managed by BNY Mellon Investment Management firms, including NIMNA Ltd.
Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but their accuracy is not guaranteed. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity) and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New York assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connection therewith. © 2006 The Bank of New York Company, Inc. All rights reserved.